Saturday, March 3, 2007

Global warming FAQ


There are many excellent FAQs on global warming available on the Internet so I won't reinvent the wheel. At the bottom of this post I've presented a few FAQ links that I think are good.

But before that, here's my own piece on the fundamentals of global warming.

Since I started this blog, the first bunch of posts have dwelled on the topic of carbon dioxide or Co2 emissions. There's a reason for that.

Amongst the various types of heat-trapping greenhouse gases present in our atmostphere, Co2 is by far the largest in volume.

The rash of carbon-themed posts was to emphasize its role in this little mess we're in and to point out that we are as guilty as everyone else in producing carbon. Yes everyone pollutes but we should care enough to know what portion of the problem has our fingerprints on it so we can start thinking about how to neutralize it.

While Co2 has been around long before man appeared, its volume began to accelerate rapidly when he appeared. Man's appetite for energy compels him to burn fossil fuels like coal, natural gas and oil, as is his desire to clear land cheaply by burning forests and blanketing entire regions with thick haze. These just a couple of examples of actions that release carbon into the atmosphere.

The planet has natural carbon sinks like ocean and forests, places that absorb carbon and sometimes produce oxygen in return. However there's a problem. We are producing much more carbon than the carbon sinks can take. Indiscriminate deforestation only serves to shrink the remaining carbon sinks even further.

As the level of unabsorbed airborne carbon rises, more heat is trapped in the atmosphere and global temperatures begin to rise. Glaciers melt, sea water level rises, the climate shows unusual patterns, the food chain goes out of whack, food supply drops and man's existence eventually comes into question.

Great emotional debates have raged on whether global warming is natural or man-made and whether the recommendations of the scientific community will actually work. Regardless of who is right or wrong, responsible countries have started to act.

Since the ozone layer panic of the 80's, international accords like the UN-backed Kyoto protocol have been launched. These initiatives set county-level targets for greenhouse gas emissions and provide financial incentives for doing so.

To measure who's dirtiest and cleanest and who's doing the most and the least, these communities have adopted carbon weight and volume as the basic unit of measurement to define pollution severity in the global warming context. Carbon is a word we'll be hearing a lot of in the coming years, from carbon offsets to carbon footprints to carbon trading, so lets start getting used to it.

Below are just a few FAQS I found useful. You can google up a lot more.

Links:
A beginner's guide to understanding the issue of global warming
Goddard Space Flight Center's Global Warming FAQ
About.com's Global Warming FAQ
UCSUSA's Global Warming FAQ
NCDC's Global Warming FAQ


Image source: NASA

Just when we thought we had it all covered


... and we discover more holes.

This time, the climate change experts apparently overlooked one big polluter: ships. And get this, the carbon dioxide emissions are found to be double that of the entire aviation industry!

At 600 and 800m tonnes of carbon dioxide, ships' emissions are in fact "nearly double Britain's total emissions and more than all African countries combined."

Maritime emissions are not covered by the Kyoto accord. It is also absent from many discussions that pounce on lesser things like airline pollution.

It is estimated that the world now has 70,000 ships and there are apparently about 20,000 new ships on order.

Why so many ships? If you own anything that is imported, chances are it was brought in by a ship. The more we consume, the more cargo ships required for transport. The fuel they often use? Diesel.

Read the article here.

Image source: Freefoto.com

Friday, March 2, 2007

Environmentally friendly Malaysians?

The facilities are great.


But the mentality? Here's paper thrown in a bin marked 'plastic.'


And plastic stuffed in a bin marked 'paper.'


These pictures were taken on Friday noon at Ikano Power Center at Kota Damansara KL, a happening place frequented by the educated and the rich.


Apathy clearly cuts across social lines.

I commend Ikano and Ikea for encouraging public awareness of recycling by walking the talk. I think they deserve an award.

Thursday, March 1, 2007

USD25 million for the best greenhouse sucker


Got an idea of how to suck one billion tonnes of Co2 a year from the atmosphere?

Al Gore and Virgin Group chairman Sir Richard Branson teamed up to launch the Virgin Earth Challenge on 9 Feb 2007, announcing the $25m cash reward that they hope will inspire innovations in the field of combating climate change.

"The earth cannot wait 60 years," said Branson at a news conference.

Read more here and here.

Top 20 Co2 emitters


Source: http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science/each-countrys-share-of-co2-emissions.html


These are 1990-1996 figures. What mystified me was the fact that Saudi Arabia recorded the second highest growth of carbon emissions at +51.2%, led only by South Korea at +69.2%.

I can understand South Korea at the top, it being a major global manufacturer and all but Saudi Arabia?

Carbon stats: How do we fare with our neighbours?

Got these off the net. All stats are per capita up to 2001/2002.




Source: http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/trends/emis/tre_coun.htm

Of the three, it looks like we are the highest emitters of Co2 per head. However I feel the data should be compared with GDP or something to get a balanced picture as countries with different population & industry mixes may have different emission profiles.

I omitted Singapore precisely because of this.

Calculate your carbon footprint


This table is extracted from an article by George Barnwell about how much carbon dioxide you're dumping into the atmosphere, the main component of greenhouse gases. And that's from electrical appliances alone. Read his short article here. Note that 1 pound is equivalent to 0.453kg.

If you're interested in the bigger picture, try out BP's Carbon Footprint Calculator and see for yourself what your carbon footprint is.


Mine is 6 tonnes a year, lower than the Singapore average of 8.38. Woohoo!

And if you're wondering what a tonne of CO2 is like, read this, also from the BP site.



Aren't numbers painful :)